-
- Courageous Kids Network
- 10 Custody Myths and How To Counter Them
- Creating Justice Through Balance: Integrating Domestic Violence
- Custodians of Abuse
- The Batterer As Parent
- Custody Visitation Scandal Cases
- Batterer Manipulation and Retaliation: Denial and Complicity In the Family Courts
- The Illusion of Protection
- Understanding the Batterer In Custody and Visitation Disputes
- Who´s Protecting Whom? the Criminalization of Protective Parents
- Legal Community Rejects Parental Alienation Syndrome
- Arizona Battered Mothers Testimony Project
- Protective Parents Survey - Pilot Study Results
- Jana's View: Parental Alienation
-
- Rate of Domestic Violence In Contested Custody Cases
- Rates At Which Batterers Receive Custody
- 10 Custody Myths and How To Counter Them
- Common Misconceptions in Addressing Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes
- The Myth of Epidemic False Allegations of Sexual Abuse In Divorce Cases
- Myths That Place Children At Risk During Custody Litigation
-
- Plot for Child Custody Ends in Murder
- High Costs Of Family Court
- CA Law: Right to Attorney for Civil Litigation
- Mother Sought help from Family Court; Now She's Dead
- Child abuse: when family courts get it wrong
- HI: Residents protest family court
- Mom who fled Iowa, ex-spouse, risks jail on return
- Family of Man Who Killed Wife, Self, Gets Custody
- Man kills wife now wants to control custody
- Man Accused of Shooting and Killing Wife Asks for Children to be Moved to Safer Home
-
- The Truth About Parental Alienation
- Parental Alienation: A Rational Approach
- Legal Community Rejects Parental Alienation Syndrome
- The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation
- Quotes By Richard Gardner
- Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation: Getting It Wrong In Child Custody Disputes
- Lesson from Alec Baldwin: Alienation Begins With You
- National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Rejects PAS
- Parental Alienation Syndrome - What Professionals Need To Know Part 1
- Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation
- Disciplining Divorcing Parents: The Social Construction of Parental Alienation Syndrome
- Parental Alienation Syndrome in Family Courts
- Parental Alienation Syndrome Revisited
- Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Paradigm For Child Abuse In Austrailian Family Law
-
- Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition
- A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System
- Guardians Ad Litem In Private Custody Litigation: the Case For Abolition
- Use of the MMPI-2 In Child Custody Evaluations Involving Battered Women: What Does Psychological Research Tell Us?.
- The Role of Psychological Testing
- For Arbiters In Custody Battles, Wide Power and Little Scrutiny
- Families' futures decided with little oversight
Published April 1, 2006 by American Bar Association's Children's Legal Rights Journal
The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation
by Jennifer Hoult
Science, Law, and Policy, 26
American Bar Association, Child. Legal Rts J. 1 (Spring, 2006).
Abstract:
Since1985, in jurisdictions all over the United States, fathers have beenawarded sole custody of their children based on claims that mothersalienated these children due to a pathological medical syndrome calledParental Alienation Syndrome ("PAS"). Given that some such cases haveinvolved stark outcomes, including murder and suicide, PAS'admissibility in U.S. courts deserves scrutiny.
This articlepresents the first comprehensive analysis of the science, law, andpolicy issues involved in PAS' evidentiary admissibility. As a novelscientific theory, PAS' admissibility is governed by a variety ofevidentiary gatekeeping standards that seek to protect legal fora fromthe influence of pseudo-science. This article analyzes everyprecedent-bearing decision and law review article referencing PAS inthe past twenty years, finding that precedent holds PAS inadmissibleand the majority of legal scholarship views it negatively.
The articlefurther analyzes PAS' admissibility under the standards defined in Fryev. United States, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Kumho TireCompany v. Carmichael, and Rules 702 and 704(b) of the Federal Rules ofEvidence, including analysis of PAS' scientific validity andreliability; concluding that PAS remains an ipse dixit and inadmissibleunder these standards. The article also analyzes the writings of PAS'originator, child psychiatrist Richard Gardner - including twenty-threepeer-reviewed articles and fifty legal decisions he cited in support ofhis claim that PAS is scientifically valid and legally admissible -finding that these materials support neither PAS' existence, nor itslegal admissibility. Finally, the article examines the policy issuesraised by PAS' admissibility through an analysis of PAS' roots inGardner's theory of human sexuality, a theory that views adult-childsexual contact as benign and beneficial to the reproduction of thespecies.
The article concludes that science, law, and policy all support PAS' present and future inadmissibility.
To read full article click here (pdf)
American Bar Association, Child. Legal Rts J. 1 (Spring, 2006).
Abstract:
Since1985, in jurisdictions all over the United States, fathers have beenawarded sole custody of their children based on claims that mothersalienated these children due to a pathological medical syndrome calledParental Alienation Syndrome ("PAS"). Given that some such cases haveinvolved stark outcomes, including murder and suicide, PAS'admissibility in U.S. courts deserves scrutiny.
This articlepresents the first comprehensive analysis of the science, law, andpolicy issues involved in PAS' evidentiary admissibility. As a novelscientific theory, PAS' admissibility is governed by a variety ofevidentiary gatekeeping standards that seek to protect legal fora fromthe influence of pseudo-science. This article analyzes everyprecedent-bearing decision and law review article referencing PAS inthe past twenty years, finding that precedent holds PAS inadmissibleand the majority of legal scholarship views it negatively.
The articlefurther analyzes PAS' admissibility under the standards defined in Fryev. United States, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Kumho TireCompany v. Carmichael, and Rules 702 and 704(b) of the Federal Rules ofEvidence, including analysis of PAS' scientific validity andreliability; concluding that PAS remains an ipse dixit and inadmissibleunder these standards. The article also analyzes the writings of PAS'originator, child psychiatrist Richard Gardner - including twenty-threepeer-reviewed articles and fifty legal decisions he cited in support ofhis claim that PAS is scientifically valid and legally admissible -finding that these materials support neither PAS' existence, nor itslegal admissibility. Finally, the article examines the policy issuesraised by PAS' admissibility through an analysis of PAS' roots inGardner's theory of human sexuality, a theory that views adult-childsexual contact as benign and beneficial to the reproduction of thespecies.
The article concludes that science, law, and policy all support PAS' present and future inadmissibility.
To read full article click here (pdf)
© 2006 American Bar Association's Children's Legal Rights Journal
Hot Topics
- child abuse
- child sexual abuse
- custody and abuse
- domestic violence
- children who witness violence
- legal abuse
- racism
- rape and sexual assault
- stalking
- media coverage of abuse
- social change
- murder suicide
- family court
- pas
- parental alienation
- video
- family court crisis
- center for judicial excellence
- parental alienation syndrome
- shelters closing
- california budget crisis
