-
- Courageous Kids Network
- 10 Custody Myths and How To Counter Them
- Creating Justice Through Balance: Integrating Domestic Violence
- Custodians of Abuse
- The Batterer As Parent
- Custody Visitation Scandal Cases
- Batterer Manipulation and Retaliation: Denial and Complicity In the Family Courts
- The Illusion of Protection
- Understanding the Batterer In Custody and Visitation Disputes
- Who´s Protecting Whom? the Criminalization of Protective Parents
- Legal Community Rejects Parental Alienation Syndrome
- Arizona Battered Mothers Testimony Project
- Protective Parents Survey - Pilot Study Results
- Jana's View: Parental Alienation
-
- Rate of Domestic Violence In Contested Custody Cases
- Rates At Which Batterers Receive Custody
- 10 Custody Myths and How To Counter Them
- Common Misconceptions in Addressing Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes
- The Myth of Epidemic False Allegations of Sexual Abuse In Divorce Cases
- Myths That Place Children At Risk During Custody Litigation
-
- Plot for Child Custody Ends in Murder
- High Costs Of Family Court
- CA Law: Right to Attorney for Civil Litigation
- Mother Sought help from Family Court; Now She's Dead
- Child abuse: when family courts get it wrong
- HI: Residents protest family court
- Mom who fled Iowa, ex-spouse, risks jail on return
- Family of Man Who Killed Wife, Self, Gets Custody
- Man kills wife now wants to control custody
- Man Accused of Shooting and Killing Wife Asks for Children to be Moved to Safer Home
-
- The Truth About Parental Alienation
- Parental Alienation: A Rational Approach
- Legal Community Rejects Parental Alienation Syndrome
- The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation
- Quotes By Richard Gardner
- Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation: Getting It Wrong In Child Custody Disputes
- Lesson from Alec Baldwin: Alienation Begins With You
- National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Rejects PAS
- Parental Alienation Syndrome - What Professionals Need To Know Part 1
- Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation
- Disciplining Divorcing Parents: The Social Construction of Parental Alienation Syndrome
- Parental Alienation Syndrome in Family Courts
- Parental Alienation Syndrome Revisited
- Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Paradigm For Child Abuse In Austrailian Family Law
-
- Court Appointed Parenting Evaluators and Guardians Ad Litem: Practical Realities and an Argument for Abolition
- A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System
- Guardians Ad Litem In Private Custody Litigation: the Case For Abolition
- Use of the MMPI-2 In Child Custody Evaluations Involving Battered Women: What Does Psychological Research Tell Us?.
- The Role of Psychological Testing
- For Arbiters In Custody Battles, Wide Power and Little Scrutiny
- Families' futures decided with little oversight
Published Fall 2003, Vol. 54, No. 4 pp 35-50 by Juvenile and Family Court Journal
Creating Justice Through Balance: Integrating Domestic Violence
by Andrea C. Farney and Roberta L. Valente
The core values underpinning family law—particularly as it addresses child custody and visitation—too often are at odds with the safety needs of victims of domestic violence. Family law, which has developed as a mechanism for defining, recognizing, establishing, reordering, or supporting the familial and intimate relationships that people have with one another, is frequently inadequate to address domestic violence. In contrast, the specialized domestic violence law provisions operating within family law function under rationales and theories distinct from those underlying family law. The inherent substantive tensions that arise when the two bodies of law are simultaneously implemented can result in conflicting court orders, unsafe interventions, and inappropriate remedies for survivors of domestic violence.
|
FAMILY LAW |
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE |
| Physical harm must constitute serious bodily injury and threats must involve imminent physicality. | Take ANY physical threat or harm seriously, including emotional and financial abuse. |
| Parental influences and access are of primary importance. | Safety is more critical than access. |
| Parties share equal responsibility to work together to arrive at mutual agreement; parties should be friendly and cooperative toward one another. |
Obtain structured agreements and schedules through the adversary system to avoid contact and negotiation for the abused party; avoid mediation. |
| Denying on-going contact or access to children for a parent is an inappropriate attempt to punish that person. |
Creativity and persistence are important to outcomes that will not result in further opportunities for control, harassment, or abuse. |
| Non-family law proceedings are unrelated matters and use of other proceedings are viewed with skepticism regarding party intent; litigants want to get a "leg up" | Weave many forms of relief together to prevent the abuser from using financial, property, or decision-making power to harm the abused party. |
| The parties are mutually and primarily responsible for making the order and post-separation relationship work. | Hold abuser accountable; enforce orders and respond to violations quickly and consistently. |
To read the full article (pdf) click here
© 2003 Juvenile and Family Court Journal
- Explore:
- Child Sexual Abuse, Custody and Abuse, Domestic Violence, Family Court, family law assumptions, mutuality, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, NCJFCJ
- Permalink:
- http://www.sfvo.org/pages/276
Hot Topics
- child abuse
- child sexual abuse
- custody and abuse
- domestic violence
- children who witness violence
- legal abuse
- racism
- rape and sexual assault
- stalking
- media coverage of abuse
- social change
- murder suicide
- family court
- pas
- parental alienation
- video
- family court crisis
- center for judicial excellence
- parental alienation syndrome
- shelters closing
- california budget crisis
